Wallace
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
Hill's game iHunt also fits into this concept of a horrible person justifying why he's actually the good guy. Given the fever pace at which he is writing splats for it and the contents of said splats, I'd call that game an excellent example of psychological protection.I think that's part of it. I also think one of the quoted posters hits an aspect on the head when they say it's about how the game glorifies justifying abusing others because you weren't treated well yourself; even without picking up on the 'SJWs are actually the villains' part it's still understandable why people might be repelled by a game that justifies abusers in that fashion.
I always associate it with David 'Olivia' Hill, who clearly believes he's allowed to big a massive cunt to the world because he's a troon. Indeed, it's a pretty mask-off game that tries to be a sort of grim revenge story with anti-hero aspects but is so poorly written turns out that you're playing predators who are morally justified because reasons, also known as just really shitty people deluding themselves that they're in the right. It's not meant to be a direct allegory for how SJWs are horrible people whose fight for justice and equality actually just comes from poorly-disguised revenge, selfishness and envy, but again, written badly by people who are like that and want to make themselves out to be the PC, not the NPC that 'normies' believe are good people, but they know the truth about who's truly good and evil in this world.
It's usually not a great idea to analyse a book as a psychological projection of the author/s, especially something that's required to have certain traits like books in the WoD franchise. But considering who the authors are and the batshit, confused nature of the books, it really has the feel of deeply unpleasant people justifying their thought processes so they're the good guys. Meaning you don't have to be one of those people who think only white people can be racist to see Beast as being fucked up abuser-defending bullshit.
Source: I haven't read the book, just one or two detailed dissections and the David Hill thread here.