- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Please kill yourself while you're away.I done fighting with FUCKWADS ... later
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please kill yourself while you're away.I done fighting with FUCKWADS ... later
That sounds pretty specific, you dumbass subhuman child molester.a computer possessing MAC address "EC:4F:82:29:B4:03" or IP address "72.9.123.215"
Todd wasn't charged with possessing "CSAM"; he was charged with making a terroristic threat.
In the course of searching his devices specifically for proof that he made said threat [which, FYI, they didn't find], they "just happened" to find a lolicon image [disgusting, but not per se illegal] which, somehow, they imagine was a basis for a new warrant seeking "CSAM".
Read the fucking thread. It’s been proven. The files he had were named Mountain Dew, named after the Mountain Dew pants the victim was wearing in some of the photos.
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.Read the fucking thread. It’s been proven. The files he had were named Mountain Dew, after the pants of the victim was wearing in some of the photos.
You’ve been here since 2015, how are you this retarded?He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
I done fighting with FUCKWADS ... later
Correct. And, as I said, said warrant appears to have been obtained due to an FBI agent "just happening" to find a lolicon image allegedly depicting a "3 to 5 year old child with an adult male penis in his mouth" - while supposedly looking for proof Todd posted the threat against the school.It wasn't lolicon, the federal warrant was very specific it was real child porn and the charge he is currently facing is real child porn including the name and Date of Birth of the victim.
I haven't seen the full text of the proposed IL legislation to which you refer; from what I know of it, it appears to refer specifically to "AI-generated" [using real children as templates] material as opposed to anime/lolicon. Personally, I'd have included it.He isn't charged (yet) with the 1,000s of lolicon and virtual child porn pics he brags about making. If the governor signs that virtual child porn law, Toad could be charged with 1,000s of counts of it. How they found it, who knows, but Toad did post on Twitch one time he had it as wallpaper when he "accidently" closed his browser on the stream (it's here on Kiwifarms)
If they can trump up a charge against him - or Trump, for that matter - they can do it to anyone.It's Toad, so I care less about his "rights".
I doubt his family couldn't afford one.I told him to hire a real lawyer in 2018 and while he says he couldn't afford one, I told him he couldn't afford not to.
As you said back then, even, that was very stupid. Of course I doubt the lawyer suspected that the FBI was more interested in looking for lolicon to use as a basis for seeking a warrant for legitimate CSAM.Toad's lawyer stipulated in April 2018 that the search of his computers could continue when the DA brought it up. There was a youtube video of 2 teens (apocales and someone else) who bragged right after Toad was arrested that "We got em".
It's not impossible, and he's been told he shouldn't even be engaging here, but you know that lolcows never learn.But like I said, Toad says it's PLAIN AND SIMPLE so if it's so plain and simple, why is this case still going on for 20 months now??? Like we learned from him posting the federal search warrant and other documents, he's got more against him then what he is telling us.
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.

I doubt his family couldn't afford one.
Todd is stupid enough to think that Miranda Rights means he has the right to some girl named Miranda.If he had just shut up and asserted his right to be silent, things might have turned out differently for him. Police interviews are not fair and the cops can and do lie during interrogations. By the way, Toad has an mp4 of the interview, be fun to see him post it.
Now back to the 2018 case for a minute.......... Toad basically talked himself into jail, instead of saying "I want a lawyer", he thought he could talk himself out of it. This is why:
Toad has been posting CP for at least ten years.After you, faggot.
Proof?
Lolicon is disgusting, it's true, and people consuming it are likely pedophiles, but it's simply not illegal.
They're going to have to do something because they are running out of time / money.
A correction:
I will file a complaint in federal court if nothing happens on Tuesday for the following reasons:
Still waiting to know how my warrant isn't a general warrant
Maybe you should read this:
why would they, the warrant was a general warrant, plain and simple. I am going to win, and I am going to sue them.
So you are one of those idiot losers from the redboard scene.He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
It was from a whole series of pictures that the Pedophile posted several years ago, on the message boards and maybe Todd's own personal blog (though I am maybe mistaken about that) There was speculation at the time that the adult in the photo was maybe Todd himself, though this was never confirmed. Some attributed the photos to another pedophile named Steven Akins who is some crazed Internet Nazi who brags about molesting his own daughter. There is a lot here we will probably never know. Was it in fact Todd in the picture and the child one of his Nephew/Nieces/Neighbors kids or did Todd save it on to his computer when someone else posted it because he is a sick individual? In any case it doesn't really matter, Todd had it on his computer and now he is going to pay the price for it. Because if the file itself is in evidence you can assume that the judge has no issues with the legality of the warrant and that the pedophiles argument is falling on deaf ears.He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
Oh fuck, that's disgusting. What a demented human being. I wonder if he stores snuff films on top of CSAM material on his hard drives???Todd posted a photo of his own dick on his old Demented Otaku forum 18 years ago which had 1,000s of cartoon images of children being skinned alive, eaten, and raped by adults or wolves (Todd loves to pretend he's the Big Bad Wolf).
Todd N9OGL
DEMENTED OTAKU BBS
http://12.156.123.39/demented/index.php (His old IP back then)
I asked twice for them to return it, and refused to had the computers back over. Even after the 2018 warrant was quashed in April of 2018 (two months before they found the image) they still refused to return it.
N9OGL said:N9OGL said:
I was never convicted, The charges were dismissed pending a investigation. The state of Illinois has three years to investigate which ends in march 2021. Now I have been told numerous times by the state attorney that I will get my stuff back after the three years. BUT if it is not then I will file a complaint.