🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Todd wasn't charged with possessing "CSAM"; he was charged with making a terroristic threat.

In the course of searching his devices specifically for proof that he made said threat [which, FYI, they didn't find], they "just happened" to find a lolicon image [disgusting, but not per se illegal] which, somehow, they imagine was a basis for a new warrant seeking "CSAM".

It wasn't lolicon, the federal warrant was very specific it was real child porn and the charge he is currently facing is real child porn including the name and Date of Birth of the victim. He isn't charged (yet) with the 1,000s of lolicon and virtual child porn pics he brags about making. If the governor signs that virtual child porn law, Toad could be charged with 1,000s of counts of it. How they found it, who knows, but Toad did post on Twitch one time he had it as wallpaper when he "accidently" closed his browser on the stream (it's here on Kiwifarms)

It's Toad, so I care less about his "rights". I told him to hire a real lawyer in 2018 and while he says he couldn't afford one, I told him he couldn't afford not to.

And yes, they never found direct proof Toad threatened that school on his computer although he could have. And Toad's lawyer stipulated in April 2018 that the search of his computers could continue when the DA brought it up. There was a youtube video of 2 teens (apocales and someone else) who bragged right after Toad was arrested that "We got em".

But like I said, Toad says it's PLAIN AND SIMPLE so if it's so plain and simple, why is this case still going on for 20 months now??? Like we learned from him posting the federal search warrant and other documents, he's got more against him then what he is telling us.

Read the fucking thread. It’s been proven. The files he had were named Mountain Dew, named after the Mountain Dew pants the victim was wearing in some of the photos.

I think the adult male with the child was the one wearing the mountain dew pants, the child herself was naked. Toad always leaves that out, he just says it was a girl just exposing her chest and nothing else...
 
Read the fucking thread. It’s been proven. The files he had were named Mountain Dew, after the pants of the victim was wearing in some of the photos.
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
 
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
You’ve been here since 2015, how are you this retarded?
 
It wasn't lolicon, the federal warrant was very specific it was real child porn and the charge he is currently facing is real child porn including the name and Date of Birth of the victim.
Correct. And, as I said, said warrant appears to have been obtained due to an FBI agent "just happening" to find a lolicon image allegedly depicting a "3 to 5 year old child with an adult male penis in his mouth" - while supposedly looking for proof Todd posted the threat against the school.

He isn't charged (yet) with the 1,000s of lolicon and virtual child porn pics he brags about making. If the governor signs that virtual child porn law, Toad could be charged with 1,000s of counts of it. How they found it, who knows, but Toad did post on Twitch one time he had it as wallpaper when he "accidently" closed his browser on the stream (it's here on Kiwifarms)
I haven't seen the full text of the proposed IL legislation to which you refer; from what I know of it, it appears to refer specifically to "AI-generated" [using real children as templates] material as opposed to anime/lolicon. Personally, I'd have included it.

It's Toad, so I care less about his "rights".
If they can trump up a charge against him - or Trump, for that matter - they can do it to anyone.

I told him to hire a real lawyer in 2018 and while he says he couldn't afford one, I told him he couldn't afford not to.
I doubt his family couldn't afford one.

Toad's lawyer stipulated in April 2018 that the search of his computers could continue when the DA brought it up. There was a youtube video of 2 teens (apocales and someone else) who bragged right after Toad was arrested that "We got em".
As you said back then, even, that was very stupid. Of course I doubt the lawyer suspected that the FBI was more interested in looking for lolicon to use as a basis for seeking a warrant for legitimate CSAM.

But like I said, Toad says it's PLAIN AND SIMPLE so if it's so plain and simple, why is this case still going on for 20 months now??? Like we learned from him posting the federal search warrant and other documents, he's got more against him then what he is telling us.
It's not impossible, and he's been told he shouldn't even be engaging here, but you know that lolcows never learn.
 
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.

Uncle Buck, you are going off what Toad says which does discredit you badly here, not the actual material in the case. While I do respect your opinion, please read the posted evidence before you make such a statement uninformed. And yes, the federal search warrant does mention a penis being stuck in the mouth of a 3-5 year old child.
daugherty dump 052924.jpg
You of all people should know not to believe what Toad says....

I doubt his family couldn't afford one.

I think they can, it's just they don't want to. Both are retired with the house paid off and both get a big retirement pension (labor union and government) on top of social security. I personally think they should give up their legal guardianship over Toad and make him live in the real world. His sister and brother have no problems living on their own.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's nice to see that this Uncle Buck poster can't be bothered to read the evidence. Multiple photos of a little girl when she was 5 years old. The girl is much older now and that the mother and daughter were contacted. This was talked about several pages ago. Like holy shit. Learn to fucking read. We even took screen shots of important parts of it.
 
Now back to the 2018 case for a minute.......... Toad basically talked himself into jail, instead of saying "I want a lawyer", he thought he could talk himself out of it. This is why

1. He admitted to the police he was aware of the school threat, but did nothing
2. He was making threats on twitter right up to his arrest but not against the school but Twitter employees. The police did not tell him they knew that until well into the interview
3. Toad lied during the interview, claiming he was asleep at the time the threats were made. But then the police showed him his Twitter stuff and he changed his story.
4. The FBI actually drove to his town on a Saturday to notify the State Attorney and the police. If they thought it was credible, it has a lot of weight.
5. They found him hiding in his basement when they arrested him. So he knew they were after him.
6. Toad also lied during the interview and claimed he knew nothing about school shootings, while the police again had his twitter postings proving otherwise. Again, they held back the Twitter information until Toad starting blabbing.

If he had just shut up and asserted his right to be silent, things might have turned out differently for him. Police interviews are not fair and the cops can and do lie during interrogations. By the way, Toad has an mp4 of the interview, be fun to see him post it.

But that's past history, Toad is now facing child porn charges.
 
If he had just shut up and asserted his right to be silent, things might have turned out differently for him. Police interviews are not fair and the cops can and do lie during interrogations. By the way, Toad has an mp4 of the interview, be fun to see him post it.
Todd is stupid enough to think that Miranda Rights means he has the right to some girl named Miranda.
 
They're going to have to do something because they are running out of time / money.

A correction:

I will file a complaint in federal court if nothing happens on Tuesday for the following reasons:

Still no complaint in federal court from you yet doll fucker... I'll keep reminding you in case you forget every few days...
 
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
So you are one of those idiot losers from the redboard scene.
He's charged for a single image described as depicting a young girl "posed with her arms in front of her under a blanket..."; nothing about a "friend" or any other person but the girl in the image, nothing about an "adult male penis in his mouth" or any of the other unproven/unalleged bullshit posted by the F4/F5 crowd and hamtards.
It was from a whole series of pictures that the Pedophile posted several years ago, on the message boards and maybe Todd's own personal blog (though I am maybe mistaken about that) There was speculation at the time that the adult in the photo was maybe Todd himself, though this was never confirmed. Some attributed the photos to another pedophile named Steven Akins who is some crazed Internet Nazi who brags about molesting his own daughter. There is a lot here we will probably never know. Was it in fact Todd in the picture and the child one of his Nephew/Nieces/Neighbors kids or did Todd save it on to his computer when someone else posted it because he is a sick individual? In any case it doesn't really matter, Todd had it on his computer and now he is going to pay the price for it. Because if the file itself is in evidence you can assume that the judge has no issues with the legality of the warrant and that the pedophiles argument is falling on deaf ears.

What is clear is that you are totally clueless about everything and are making a fool of yourself. As far as I am concerned those that encourage a pedophile are nothing but a pedophile themselves.
olgbaby.jpg
 
That's too long of a post for Uncle Buck to read. He can't even read the screen shots we've taken of the case.
 
Todd posted a photo of his own dick on his old Demented Otaku forum 18 years ago which had 1,000s of cartoon images of children being skinned alive, eaten, and raped by adults or wolves (Todd loves to pretend he's the Big Bad Wolf).

Todd N9OGL
DEMENTED OTAKU BBS
http://12.156.123.39/demented/index.php (His old IP back then)
 
Todd posted a photo of his own dick on his old Demented Otaku forum 18 years ago which had 1,000s of cartoon images of children being skinned alive, eaten, and raped by adults or wolves (Todd loves to pretend he's the Big Bad Wolf).

Todd N9OGL
DEMENTED OTAKU BBS
http://12.156.123.39/demented/index.php (His old IP back then)
Oh fuck, that's disgusting. What a demented human being. I wonder if he stores snuff films on top of CSAM material on his hard drives???
 
I asked twice for them to return it, and refused to had the computers back over. Even after the 2018 warrant was quashed in April of 2018 (two months before they found the image) they still refused to return it.

I kept egging you on why you were afraid to ask for your computers back and you stated it was because they had 90 days, 1 year, then 3 years to search your computers (you kept changing your story). Your own attorney in April 2018 stipulated that the computers could continue to be searched as part of the ongoing investigation into the school threat without objection. We know from the archives here that you didn't because you said the police never turned them over to the FBI, which turned out to be a false statement.

I even showed you the form to fill out to apply to get back your stuff and you just went on another rage stating it was the police's job to return them to your house when they were done. I also told you to hire a lawyer because you couldn't afford not to. And your parents are out $12,500 and counting because of your actions, even if you were found innocent tomorrow.

N9OGL said:
N9OGL said:
I was never convicted, The charges were dismissed pending a investigation. The state of Illinois has three years to investigate which ends in march 2021. Now I have been told numerous times by the state attorney that I will get my stuff back after the three years. BUT if it is not then I will file a complaint.

Oh, he never filed any complaint after March 2021......
 
Back
Top Bottom