I know I'm kinda late to the party but I just watched
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse and here are some of my thoughts.
You can tell that Phil Lord and Christopher Miller are doing their damn hardest to push the idea that animation is cinema and not just for kids, and that's why the animation is great and beautiful in the movie, but at the same time over-done, for example, in the Gwen scenes, which the color and tone of the animation will always change depending on which character are we looking at and their personality. It's kinda jarring for me. For an animated film, it's still great.
The villains are okay. I like the charm of Spot (and I felt I recognized that voice, before realizing it's Jason Schwartzman) started out as this incompetent villain who wants to be his nemesis and ends up becoming a big threat in the film. Spider-Man 2099/Miguel does feel nerfed, and his backstory on everything was kinda meh.
Regarding the Spider-Mans, I didn't like how they nerfed Peter Parker hardcore (in fact all the Spider-Mans of different universes are nerfed). I appreciate his arc from the last movie was completed, and now that Parker has accepted into becoming a husband and father in this movie. However, I think Peter's baby should have stayed home, and Peter should have kept the comedy against villains and be serious with Miles and Miguel, because his humor does not work when Miguel is in the scene. Peter Parker with a pink nightrobe and a baby-carrier as well as showing phone pics, ugh. Everything else, Miles is great. Gwen felt too melodramatic, pregnant African lady, uhhhhh....., Spider Punk's cool, Indian Spider-man is meh. Spider-byte, only see her as a set-up as an alternate love-interest if Gwen does not work out. The fact that the some of these Spider-mans change their minds so easily just because Miles wanted to break the norm was meh.
If we are going for more nit-picks, I was not too big of a fan on that every father-figure of a Spider-Man must die to fulfill the canon. The logic in which breaking canon kills the multiverse sounds retarded. I also dislike the idea that Miles Morales of that Earth was never intended to be the Spider-man because we see Miles Morales in different Spider-man universes become Spider-man, and that a universe can have more than one Spider-man, like the PS4 universe. Like why don't we see more Miles Morales in that HQ.
Also, last of all, the fact that every Spider-Man in every movie (including live action), video game, TV series, are all part of this multiverse left a bad taste in my mouth. I mean sure, it's great that they haven't forgotten
The Spectacular Spider-Man series, but the fact that everything in the plot of everything we love about Spider-Man is now determined by a multiverse authority is just too much for me, and takes away the meaning of every scene.
I also was not a fan of the cliffhanger they put up.
Despite this, the movie is a good 7/10 but not as great as the first one, and unfortunately ruined Spider-Man for me.
Regarding
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, which I watched a week ago, I thought that film was a bit better than
Spider-man: Across the Spider-verse, and I loved Death and Horner as villains. The plot sorta felt cliche but that fight scene between Puss and Death was pretty sweet, and at least Death gave us a really good impression that he is to be respected in all of the film, even after this defeat. Honestly thought Wagner 'Pablo Escobar' Moura and John Mulaney carried the film.
You can always spot a failure from a mile away. Friend saw the new DreamWorks movie and said it was mediocre even by DW standards. 'Course when you look at the character designs, it's no wonder it's flopping so hard.
He said Ruby herself is actually cute when given the chance, but I can't see kids having the attention span nor patience for it.
But you see, that is the DreamWorks development process. For every great movie that we do (Puss in Boots), we must follow with a trash animated film to appease Moloch so he won't be angry with us.
You want to know something funny too? This show is like every single adult cartoon out
right now, just without the generic Family guy/Big mouth art style.
- shock humor
- Hyper-sexual gay characters. (we gotta appeal to the fags and faghags watching amIright?)
- Cringe social commentary.
- Break neck pacing.
- One dimensional characters.
- Asshole main protagonist.
I mean what the heck does adult as a genre even mean at this point? A lot of the bad elements of adult films are shared with the bad elements of children films, and it seems a lot of children are enjoying these so called "adult" animations and films.
Adult to me is now just a label to tell me you want to be edgy and break norms. I don't care if your film or series has mature elements or not, if it's not a good story and if the characters are just sufferable, your film or series is garbage. If your work is mainly enjoyed by adults, so be it, it's mostly enjoyed by adults. If it's enjoyed by everyone, it's enjoyed by everyone. If children enjoy it, then children enjoy it. I find everything that labelled as adult to be very childish. I don't even think the people behind
Aeon Flux labeled their series as adult, they just want a series of different cool-ass stories to tell and hence everything is formatted as if it was an anthology.
Man, using TOR kinda ruins this thread for me. The fact that there are so many YouTube videos in this thread but they are blocked by a Google message thinking I'm a bot.