Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Gays could have easily chosen to be happy when anti-sodomy laws were struck down. They could have easily made peace with the fact that homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle that normal people have perfectly valid reasons to be repulsed by. They could have easily not whine about not being included in an institution (marriage) that they had scant respect for in the first place, kept their shit underground and away from polite society, and not shit where everyone else eats.
I'm seeing legislation popping up all over for LGBT "reproductive rights" in the US. Giving gays and lesbians legal marriage status for hospital visits and sharing assets was easy enough to approve because that looked and felt unfair and there weren't any children involved. But now they're demanding getting insurance coverage for IVF and surrogacy. Yikes. Once a few permissive precedents have been made (and anti discrimination laws are in place) it's very difficult to say No when the really uncomfortable (and ridiculous) stuff is reached. And of course, if it's ok'd for LGB, it will be ok'd for the T.

I don't want my insurance premiums (or taxes for that matter) to go up so Gary and Stan (or Erin and Zinnia) can rent a womb for 9 months. And then later take their toddlers to the Pride parade in kiddie bondage gear.
 
Listening to Riley on Joe Rogan....

Lia please 41% yourself you fucking piece of shit.
I was actually just about to post about that.
Short story, Riley Gaines went on Joe Rogan to talk about the troon swimmer Thomas. The reason this is interesting to me is one, crazy story, and two, I view it as the tide turning. JRE is the biggest show, like bar none. The fact that someone, multiple someones actually, are going full YWNBAW on that show is awesome and a sign that normies are kind of fed up with this shit.
It’s a very interesting interview because Riley gives no fucks and just confirms all the crazy behind the scenes shit that was going on in that university. If you don’t accept William then you’re responsible for him killing himself, if you talk about this without our blessing we take away your scholarships, if you complain about his mighty shlong in your locker room you can be brought up on sexual harassment charges, like I’ll be real here she’s legit brave for fighting back.
Now, I know that there are a bunch of blue collar good ol’ boys listening to JRE while they do their thing, and if you’re a father, or even a good man, who hears this shit and you aren’t livid I don’t even know how you exist.
 
IVF and surrogacy should be offered through employment and up to each insurer, I think. Agree it shouldn’t be “mandated” or offered to trans people.

It would be good to have a child, but it’s not necessary for me, and surrogacy can be a legal and emotional minefield. It isn’t like requiring mental health parity in coverage (big push for that in my area, that you have to at least cover antidepressants and such and some costs of therapy if your plan covers physical health). No one will die from lack of children, and you can adopt provided you go through checks. Which should be thorough. There’s abuse in my family background so I am sensitive to placing kids somewhere safe and respecting their innocence and boundaries.

I do think it’s shitty that the non-bio fag parent can’t legally adopt their own child though in those cases, you have to bring it and family to court which you can’t do until bub has an immune system, so what if bio mom dies in childbirth or shortly after? In some of those cases, the same grandparents who threw out the gay kid end up raising the baby to hate their background. The other partner has zero rights until they establish. It’s expensive too. There was a couple who did this, then applied for a state adoption tax credit for non-bio mom to adopt her own kid. State grumbled, but gave them their ca. $4000. Smart move to find that loophole.

I think it might be better for the parenting thing to skip the artificial reproduction if you can, and use a trusted friend in your community, someone normal. Or open adopt. A child should have connections and know where they came from. There is a very normal couple I go to church with who open adopted their daughter from someone who had a teenage indiscretion. They paid her costs and share all about the now 7 year old. Mom visits regularly.

I don’t know, being a woman sets me to thinking about the issues for the child and not just “I want a baby.” I think it is more responsible. But for now I’m happy with my pets. Have cared for about 30 animals and find homes. ❤️
 
Gays could have easily chosen to be happy when anti-sodomy laws were struck down. They could have easily made peace with the fact that homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle that normal people have perfectly valid reasons to be repulsed by. They could have easily not whine about not being included in an institution (marriage) that they had scant respect for in the first place, kept their shit underground and away from polite society, and not shit where everyone else eats.
Yeah tbh I think gays should have been happy with civil unions and left it at that. That was a fair compromise, but gay marriage was the goal and they weren't going to stop until they got it. In retrospect, it does seem more about sticking it to Christians than anything else. I'm not a Christian, so I can't say I give too many fucks, except to note that it does show an incessant need to cross boundaries which is a narcissistic trait.

Especially as the inability to respect boundaries and compromise has just gotten more outrageous since gay marriage was won. For instance, kink at pride. The reasonable solution to it is to have an adult-only pride event for that kink shit and keep the rest PG if you know kids will be there. However, they refuse to budge on even that. They will either gaslight that it's not happening despite ample evidence online or use word salad to somehow justify it. Things like this are what make me question if it's not just the T that needs to be done away with, but time will tell I guess.


Show a united front. It created a strong pressure to “be normal”, clear rules and steps for how to present, and an instinctive check on yourself that reminds you you’re a living representative. That you are in a fishbowl.
See I can imagine how being a "minority" could magnify this feeling of living in a fishbowl, but what I think many minorities don't understand is that in order for society to function properly everyone needs to do that to a certain extent. The issue is now there is this push to tell minorities that they shouldn't have to do what everyone else does. This creates a massive sense of entitlement within minorities that they deserve special treatment, and clearly the LGB as a whole has bought into this and I suspect it will backfire on them if it isn't already.
 
Yeah tbh I think gays should have been happy with civil unions and left it at that.
I'm of the opinion that the government shouldn't be involved in "Marriage" for anyone, just civil unions. Whatever you want to call it, whatever ceremonies you want, be it religious or not, is up to you, but the government side should just recognize it as a generic "union" between 2 persons*.

* Furries and Trannies are not people.
 
I think it might be better for the parenting thing to skip the artificial reproduction if you can, and use a trusted friend in your community, someone normal. Or open adopt.
I find it interesting that you are cool with gay people having biological children despite earlier speaking of the " altruistic kin selection" hypothesis. If you truly believe homosexuality is Mother Nature's way of freeing up resources for your kin or being around to help your nieces and nephews, why are you for gay people going against their evolutionary purpose? If it's truly gay people's destiny to be the gay uncle or lesbian aunt why not accept it?

I could maybe get behind gay people adopting because the kid is already not in an ideal situation, but I'm not for gay people having biological children. To purposefully bring a child into this world knowing you're going to deny them a mother or a father is criminal IMO. Children need a mother and father because each role is different and meets different needs. To suggest otherwise is troon logic because it ignores the biological differences between men and women.
 
Sorry about double post but just saw this.If transgenderism was a real thing then I do wonder why we dont see cases such as "Male monkey with female monkey's brain" or vice versa?If transgenderism is a real thing then its so bizarre that such a concept only exists for human beings.That idea the neutered male dog suddenly thinks he's female is a weird case, but if they really believed that then surely they'd give the dog a CT brain scan to see his "female brain".
Or why we never see other cross sex organs. If it's possible to have a female brain in a male body why not female lungs, or a female liver?

Organs are sexually dimorphic btw, which is an actual problem because about 75% of donors are female. And male bodies are more likely to reject female organs, but there aren't enough donated male organs to go around.
 
Some of the behavior of the gay men I chalk to being male, which sounds mean but
is correct, lol
I know people immediately decide a man-hate thread poster is always shitposting and/or full of shit when it comes to the subject, but that’s the answer, simple as. If more males, regardless of sexuality, exercised self-awareness/self-control when it comes to their sex drives, the world would look very different. Not only would fetish-driven movements like troonism not be tolerated, but far fewer gay men would have died of AIDS from unsafe sex with tens or even hundreds of partners, and not living in a world soaked in misogynist religions and depraved porn would be nice. Some of my gay male friends are not and have never been manwhores, but some I really do worry about—I think one in particular fully knows he’s hurting himself, but you have to want to change. Leading a horse to water, and so on. A lot of them fully embrace being degenerates, but the pathology of my friend seems more similar to when abused women sleep around than someone truly proud of taking anonymous dick, with the added “isn’t this just what it means to be gay?” cultural brainworms he’s only rarely talked directly about.

I absolutely do meme on the subject, but the supposedly uniquely homo degeneracy of having so many sex partners, public sex etc is something I think many many straight men WOULD do, if they could. This is based on knowledge of pornography—you can argue not all straight men and of course it isn’t, but it’s also of course almost entirely being made for and by men, and cranking it to pornography of a specific subject makes you MORE, not less, into the fetish or whatever depicted therein. Also why I have never had any patience for the “AI CSAM will save kids from being molested!!!” stance bc it is so fucking divorced from reality—there are so many terabytes of CP in this hell world that I doubt even a thousand people doing nothing but viewing it, day in and day out, would get through it in a hundred years. It is not for lack of content that children, and for that matter women in “normal” porn, are abused. It is a feature, not a bug. Increased porn access and mainstream acceptance thereof, social media, and so-called transhumanism (your body isn’t you, it’s just a vessel, so it’s fine and good actually to dramatically alter it, for coom or whatever else drives you) are some of the biggest drivers of this type of modern woman-hate. Troons feel entitled to sexual access to women, children, anyone and everyone, and they learned that from the same industry at work indoctrinating other flavors of predatory creeps and pornsick teens.
 
but I'm not for gay people having biological children. To purposefully bring a child into this world knowing you're going to deny them a mother or a father is criminal IMO. Children need a mother and father because each role is different and meets different needs. To suggest otherwise is troon logic because it ignores the biological differences between men and women.
I agree. Role models matter. And it is a Hendersonian luxury belief to say otherwise.

When same sex couples have "biological children" there's always going to be some outside genetics in the mix. (Yeah, yeah, they're working on engineering both eggs and sperm from gay men's T cells or whatever, but that utterly disgusting tech ain't with us yet.) So whether it's a sperm donor or an egg donor, one bio parent or another is not going to be part of the child's upbringing the way the way they have for millions of years. And the traits and characteristics they pass along aren't going to be familiar or expected. No one is a blank slate when they're born. Parentage matters and expresses itself. Not only that, but parentage is recognizable. I don't know if any studies have been done, but I bet that having parents and siblings that share physical characteristics like hair color and facial structure matters to a child too. That used to matter a lot socially. If you didn't look like your siblings or parents it would be remarked upon. And there were significant social consequences if there wasn't a good explanation for it.

Back in the Before Times, gays and lesbians who were really hankering for their own offspring used to just marry and have families together. Sometimes they married accommodating hetero partners and made do with the limits that imposed. Those kinds of compromises and self sacrifice are considered too onerous these days.

Also being considered under the "reproductive rights" banner is insurance coverage for unmarried individuals to deliberately become single parents. Single parenthood is well established as a bad idea. Crafting laws to promote it is nuts.
 
If more males, regardless of sexuality, exercised self-awareness/self-control when it comes to their sex drives, the world would look very different.
I think that's a statement men even can agree on. Even if you're male supremacy, if Ghengis Khan controlled his dick a good percent of humanity would be different. And if you hate straight male troons, you can definitely agree on them.
 
I am a bit of a conspiracy schizo. I dont believe in shit like the flat or hollow earth, mind you. and I dont believe any spiritual mumbo jumbo. I do, however, believe in: The reptilians, satanic pedophilic elites, their pillaging of somewhat unknown and far-away areas in search of kids to kidnap, etc. I am crazy and idgaf. Now, how will I relate this to troonism? well...

See, transsexualism is like a godsend to the elites. OMG tzir what are ya talking about? see, they can fool you with giving you trans rights, validating trannies, being super pro-trans, etc. while doing evil shit. they can dodge implementing change that'd actually benefit everyone (what those changes are depends on the country, political context at the time, the current economy of that place, etc.) with saying "trans rights are human rights, and we'll ensure all trans people feel safe!!!!!". EPSTEIN? sandra bullock putting baby foreskin on her skin (sandra bullock ellen interview, look it up), doja cat and lil nas x's humilliation ritual? anyway I think trans women are real women and they should be allowed in women's places and they're just as valid as non-trans, cervix-having, uterus-possessing XX chromosomed humans.

Trans is mega sexual. It has to be. it's based on gender stereotypes, their fetishization, and may come packed together with other fetishes. It's never not sexual. now, why is this relevant? The elites love kids. the elites love whores. OLD PERVERTS WITH NO MORALS LOOOVE the young.

Trans kids are hypersexualized by their supporters. their transchausen MOMS (it's always them libbed out women), the PEDOPHILIC DRAG QUEENS AND I WILL NOT APOLOGIZE TO YOU HOMOS, and handmaidens and enablers who may also be pedophiles themselves. Introduce a kid to an inherently sexual concept young, put them in adult spaces full of men practicing a SEXUAL art (drag is fucking sexual FUCK YOU), and tell them naked hunks in thongs and dog masks in public are normal and empowering. what will happen when that troon kid grows up? he'll be more comfortable with the idea of being viewed as a sex object. he'll be more comfortable being treated as a sex object. he might even be comfortable whoring himself out to perverted old men to pay for his surgeries. The elites love sex and trans kids will sadly be the ones most comfortable and groomed into easily providing it for them.

If it were for the elites (and im talking real elites) we'd all be their commodities in more ways than just their help. troons are the subsector of the population that'll be more willing to do the sexual part without needing to be kidnapped. us men and women are all different. no man or woman is like the other. troons, however? they all come in different, but predictable and easily categorized flavors. I seriously think troonism has now turned into a convenient pawn for the elites.

schizo rant but idgaf. I mean, the proof is in the pudding. the pudding being jeffrey marsh telling kids to contact him and go no contact with their parents. dylan anorexia mulvaney playing a bimbofied and sexualized caricature of teen girls. blaire white acting like a full-on sexdoll (wanna help the cause, rob? fucking detransition and denounce trans ideology, you fucking now GC-pandering wannabe). Buck Angel buying into it so hard she can't bring herself to admit she's fucked up and she really is like all other pooners. Riley Dennis telling lesbians to suck the cock. Contrapoints being a degenerate motherfucker. EVERY FUCKING TROON EVER POSTED ON THIS FUCKING WEBSITE!!!! they're all fucking normalizing this shit to young kids!!!!
 
Or why we never see other cross sex organs. If it's possible to have a female brain in a male body why not female lungs, or a female liver?

Organs are sexually dimorphic btw, which is an actual problem because about 75% of donors are female. And male bodies are more likely to reject female organs, but there aren't enough donated male organs to go around.
Super interesting on the subject of troons are the effects of bone marrow transplants. A man receiving female bone marrow will start showing female cells (with genetics matching the donor) on tests. You effectively become a chimera. There’s an example of a Korean man who inexplicably tested as female, which turned out to be because he’d received a marrow transplant from his daughter.
Wonder when troon doctors are going to start charging for “scrape out the old marrow and swap in new female marrow” surgeries.
 
See I can imagine how being a "minority" could magnify this feeling of living in a fishbowl, but what I think many minorities don't understand is that in order for society to function properly everyone needs to do that to a certain extent. The issue is now there is this push to tell minorities that they shouldn't have to do what everyone else does. This creates a massive sense of entitlement within minorities that they deserve special treatment, and clearly the LGB as a whole has bought into this and I suspect it will backfire on them if it isn't already.
I'm not against giving minority groups equal rights, but what I hate about the modern left is that they put said groups on a pedestal who can do no wrong.When a black male commits a crime like stealing, they blame "lack of economic opportunity" for why he was forced to rob places.As for the LGBT, I dont know what they teach kids at school, but the fact that 99% of teenagers I've noticed online are obsessed with being "queer" and think being straight or "cis" is boring has made me convinced that they do teach that being LGBT makes one special,unique,awesome, and oppressed.This is why I hate the whole "affirmative action" policy because it tells these groups that if you dont get hired for the job, you can just cry discrimination, and sue the company that chose the other person.
 
I hate myself so I was listening to the insufferable Jammiedoger's response to the Praguer U's detrans and I realized just how much detransitioners are treated like ex vegans. Ex vegans are told they were never really vegan. Ex vegans are told that the "science says" it's totes healthy to be vegan so just ignore that your hair is falling out and your mouth is suddenly full of cavities. Ex vegans are told they are lying about their experiences. Ex vegan are told to just shut up because it makes the moment look bad. What is it about human beings today that they are so obsessed with trying to one up mother nature? It's so fascinating tbh.
 
I'm not against giving minority groups equal rights, but what I hate about the modern left is that they put said groups on a pedestal who can do no wrong.When a black male commits a crime like stealing, they blame "lack of economic opportunity" for why he was forced to rob places.

I think the pedestal loses sight of how we are all people, and subject to failings of human nature. Forgetting that and believing you are special, you are right, feeds into immoral behavior and pisses people off on all sides. It’s almost a philosophical stance.

(That said it is downright cruel and almost a crime that 1/3 of food produced is wasted, mostly at store levels, while 1 in 6 Americans doesn’t consistently have enough to eat. Employees are told to throw away hundreds of pounds of food a day, even to lock dumpsters or pour bleach on discarded items, so I’m unlikely to snitch on someone stealing food for personal consumption).
 
This is a stupid question, but the whole cauterising your vagina shut has to happen after a salpingectomy and hysto, right? so that you no longer have periods. What's the minimum amount of previous steps that you have to do before you could do the cauterisation?
 
Random thought. If you're in the USA, and an oldfag... Do you remember what a big fucking deal the movie "The Crying Game" was? The big secret was a huge salacious moment in the entertainment industry. This would only be eclipsed by Sharon Stone's gash flash a few years later. The film isn't that old. It's just a mindfuck to see how far pop culture has shifted. The girl cock has gone mainstream.
 
A strange and blackpilling phenomenon to look out for on Twitter: if you know a leftist trans ally with a small-to-medium following, search their tweets for mentions of gender/trans/terf/non-binary. Look at the replies to witness someone in 2018 make a reasonable observation like "are you sure the TERF label isn't an attempt to silence feminist women deemed guilty of wrongthink" or "I will give someone the benefit of the doubt if they are concerned about trans kid charities being too liberal in giving out breast binders or recommending puberty blockers". Then search that person's tweets to find they have capitulated and now have pronouns in bio and sperg about transphobic bigots.

The opposite of peaking. Troughing?
 
Back