Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Whistlin' Crustacean]

I was just watching the replay of the Potentially Criminal/Gosney stream they had right when the doc got leaked.
I don't believe I saw this mentioned in the thread: CGoody was in the chat (around 56:40), and surprisingly enough, he wasn't sweeping. Aside from "Nick never tells me to ban people," but that's more ass-covering than sweeping.

"Nick is an idiot if he speaks about the document," "Nick is insecure." I've never seen this weirdo being the tiniest bit critical of Rekieta before. For him, this is positively scathing. Could this be the moment Nick's most ardent noseguarding janny balldowasher finally flees the sinking ship?

---

Addendum: Who the fuck gives a 9-year-old cocaine?! They already act like they're on the stuff most of the time!
I remember being 9. I can't imagine what I'd have done on hardcore stimulants, but it would have certainly included some heavy property damage or arson. What a stupid idea. So stupid, in fact, that it could have only originated from the mind of a woman (derogatory). As such, I completely believe Nick when he goes "I wasn't even there," "I don't even know the whole story," throwing the other polycule members under the bus

Joking aside, I'm actually in the "sudden family medical emergency was an accidental overdose" camp. The kid probably found a container lying around and decided to use is as a condiment on her spagettios or something, out of pure curiosity. God knows there wasn't much supervision at the coke hovel. As to why the child wasn't driven immediately to the hospital? The parents (and the hotwife) must have decided that they would rather risk the child's death rather than risk being outed as junkies. Well, they've been outed anyways, and who knows what sort of trauma and damage the kid now has because she's been denied proper medical care. I hope this speculation isn't true, by the way, but it does seem to be firmly in the realm of possibility. Then again, the realm of possibility happens to include things like "the 'knowingly permit sexual abuse' charge wasn't a typo after all."

See, the addendum started out all lighthearted and shit, and now I've made myself mad again.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

I will say that if the coke was given to the kid on purpose, it's more likely to be Kayla than Nick. Men are more likely to sexually abuse kids, however, physical abuse is typically a mom thing.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

Been a while since I did law so treat this more as an educated guess than actual expertise.

If I was the state prosecutor, it might be worth considering Josh as a witness regarding his drug use and noted negative behavioral changes because.

1. He is a proprietor of a website that actively documents and disseminates information regarding Nick.

2. Josh has had direct communication with Nick and has publicly stated he has spoke about related subject matter via electronic communication

3. He is currently obtaining the video tape of the arrest and depiction of his house.

I would subpoena these communications and potentially Josh himself to impeach Nick’s defense and credibility. Thus, X(Formerly known as Twitter), his website discussions/dms, and phone conversations might be subpoenaed.

Though not as many, there are a few reasons Nick’s defense could subpoena Josh

1. Highlight Josh and his website as super mega Hitler particle abundant to show certain evidence may not be credible tldr “Das nawttruuuu!”

2. Subpoena communications to show potential exculpatory evidence

3. Not legal related, but to force Josh to testify becausehe knows our dear Josh is notably camera shy and would probably be what Nick could do to be vindictive

I can’t guarantee he will be called to the stand, but I can almost guarantee he will be subpoenaed for his communications. I would recommend he speak to Harding on this matter. (I'm sure he has/will)

I think everyone is vastly overestimating the resources a county DA is going to put towards a Mickey Mouse, pretty straightforward possession case. They might go an extra mile due to Nick being a lawyer and the public attention, but he’s not going to bust the office budget to doggedly pursue every spec of possible evidence. This isn’t murder one, it’s not a CSI mystery. They got a warrant and found coke, very cut and dry. It’s almost inconceivable it will go to trial but Nick might be that retarded.

It’s just a shame Nick can’t be prosecuted for being an absolute retard and legendary douchebag, but that’s the world we live in.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Oh my God, stupid question but does this mean that this young child consumed cocaine? It would be bad enough if it was just dropped on her. No God please don’t let Nicks kids get into drugs like him and Kayla!

Yes. We've covered this earlier today but Nick's kid, Audrey enjoyed the nose clams.

 

[变性黑鬼]

View attachment 6102299
The AI summary made me laugh

By the time this goes to trial, we're going to have a fully animated, fully voiced AI Nick Rekieta livestreaming his own trial and shitting all over him for his own misdeeds and it is going to be glorious.

These fuckers are really going with the "these people are nonces who want to see kids" dumb route. Apparently if you think children shouldn't take recreational cocaine, you're a fucking nonce according to these people.

The human mind excels at finding outs and excuses for itself and those it considers part of its tribe. This is just the last refuge of the mind before it can no longer come up with ways to vindicate Rekieta.

Got eem
View attachment 6102364

That's the face of someone who is too tired to come up with an excuse. He can't help but laugh at his own situation.

Nick cut his hair super-short and will probably continue to do so every week or two hoping to have all the coke-positive hair off of him by the time the Court gets around to ordering hair tests on himself and Kayla. I’ll bet Kayla’s got a super-short haircut as well.

You have somehow used the facts to explain Nick's retarded haircut. I applaud you, and I want you to be right, but wouldn't he need to shave his whole body? If he gradually starts shaving his beard, I'll have to come back and bow down to your incredibly specific autism powers.

 

[Doctor Love]

What like saliva, from their parents kissing them on their head like parents do?

Well, yes, "like" saliva. But saliva is almost entirely water - you'd struggle to get any real data from saliva, since it's 99.x% pure water. If you slobbered out 100ml of mouthwater you would only have around 100-1000mg of any kind of substance in there.

yeah, in cohort 1 - the contaminated sample - it persists for at least the duration of the trial 8 weeks.

It's an actual relief that generously covering one of his children with cocaine is a viable excuse.

 

[trash cat]

From the doc, the indication that only the one kid returned a positive result (and a result that is insanely high for a child) indicates (to me) that this is not a single exposure event but a result of significant 'over time' exposure

@trash cat
You either need to read my post again or I need sleep a lot more than I thought as all those points were covered in my post.

My post was addressing your statement (and others' similar claims) that "this is not a single exposure event but a result of significant 'over time' exposure."

We cannot make any scientific claim about single vs. multi exposure to cocaine from the report data that is currently available. That was the core of my reply and is why I provided example slides from hair test sectioning (a test which would give information on whether the child's cocaine consumption was a single event or was ongoing, and for how long)



If I repeated other points that you had previously written, sorry, that was not my intention.

---

Lastly, on another note, I'm reading that Nick might be claiming that cocaine or cocaine metabolites somehow innocently transferred into his daughter's hair?

This simply does not happen, and is not possible if they detected cocaine metabolites. The child's levels are too high (5000 pg/mg = 10th percentile for adult cocaine users, and 30th percentile when adjusting for the child's body mass or surface area)



Transfer like that is not realistic, unless Lord Balldo is claiming he regularly peed urinary metabolites like benzoylecgonine (BE) onto his daughter's hair.

Nick - if the government test is bullshit then I challenge you to go to court and commission an independent hair follicle test for your daughter , with sectioning. Then release the results publicly to clear your name.

But we know you won't do that because these results are real.

 

[Isaiah Praer]

Also, is there any medicinal substance that can cause a positive cocaine test?

Cocaine is on Schedule II because there are legitimate medical indications for its use as a topical anesthetic and numbing agent. Depending on where the testing antibodies latch onto the metabolites, maybe other tropane alkaloids, like atropine and scopolamine could yield a false positive. So yes, a positive test above the amounts associated with legit use calls for a second test to confirm the molecules you're dealing with.

On the other hand, letting your kid chew on jimsonweed may actually rank higher in irresponsibility than feeding them cocaine.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Amide anaesthetics won't ping a false positive for cocaine. There aren't any medications that will. The most plausible scenario where the kid wasn't using cocaine is that the lab techs just completely shat their pants and and mixed up her paperwork with a crackhead's somehow.

I would think any test result showing so high on an 8 or 9 year old will trigger somebody, either the lab or CPS to kick it back for a retest to confirm.

It would absolutely complicate it. That’s why doing so is a big no no. Otherwise everyone would do it. The question is what other fuckery might be going on.

I mean, if you are having underhanded questionable shit done to you, you’d be silly not to use it to your benefit.

And the leak absolutely seems to be somebody or group of people trying to screw him over.

Why would it complicate the Prosecutions case? This is not the prosecutions document. This was something publicly available at the Courthouse. The only thing questionable about it is the failure to redact the children's names. That failure has zero impact on or benefit to Nick.

It WOULD perhaps be the most reasonable explanation, but most people are willing to believe the worst about Rekieta. You know, after he made his familys home into a bordello-cocaine-dungeon.

It's the whole Occam's Razor thing. You find a 9 year old testing positive for moderate weekly cocaine injestion in a house with 26grams of cocaine. It's probably not a false positive from her Ritalin, cough syrup or Flintstones vitamins. Often the worst is the most probable.

And honestly that's not even assuming the worst. To fully appreciate the true "worst" you have to pan back a bit and look at the entire scene. We have;
- a pack of sexually deviant adults, both parents and unrelated adults, engaging in rampant hardcore and ever more bizarre and extreme sexplay in the house with 5 young children.
- a metric crapton of drugs and booze. Including dealer levels of cocaine, ketamine a famous date rape drugs, whatever the brown shit is, and whatever was in Mommy's special medicine bottles.
- the 8-9 year old girl, and ONLY the 8-9 year old girl tests positive for cocaine use at a level far above environmental or accidental contact.

Pop Quiz fellow Mandatory Reporters; what question or scenario immediately springs to mind given this set of facts? Why does only the 8-9 year old girl seem to have been involved with the drugs, in a house full of sexual deviants?

If you're now feeling nauseated at the possibility, congratulations, you've figured out the worst case scenario that is now on CPS and Law Enforcements radar. Hopefully it is not what happened for the kids sake. But at some point somebody is going to ask that question.

 

[GotMail_2000]

Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.

I have no idea why anyone ever thought Nick was a good man. He seemed like an average person online for a while, but you don't just get to be a "good man" for making a few okay Youtube videos and gobbling up gossip dollars by covering big court cases.
The dude let his mask slip years ago with those statements implying that he wanted to fuck fans or other women, and progressively started drinking more, and wanting to talk less about law and more about hedonistic behaviour. It's not that you can't be a good person and have vices but when you almost start to flaunt it, or want exposure for it, you know something is up. Didn't think it was this bad, though.

 

[Bonesjones]

Well, yes, "like" saliva. But saliva is almost entirely water - you'd struggle to get any real data from saliva, since it's 99.x% pure water. If you slobbered out 100ml of mouthwater you would only have around 100-1000mg of any kind of substance in there.

They literally do oral swab drug tests.

 

[Cirrhosis_of_Liver]

Nick is a monster, has always been a monster, and the surest sign before any of his monsterings became public was his pursuit of e-fame as "wholesome family man." A contradiction in terms.

 

[Doctor Love]

I'm glad I was retarded and misconstruing. Still, that possibility seems foreclosed if the pdf found by @Balldo's Gate is correct and they did test for benzoylecglonine instead.

Oh you weren't misconstruing. I thought so too, but @Dyn went and found the evidence.

Nick is excused, he didn't cover his child in bodily fluids, he only covered her with cocaine.

 

[Hot Dog]

I think it was an honest attempt to be one. Marraige breaksdown, which was happening, mess with you. And it feels like he thought it would be easier and better if he stopped trying. He didn’t just stop trying to be a good person he stopped moreorless trying anything.

He faked everything and like @feral cat #6385 mentioned he is fucking weak and a failure of a man. Stop making excuses for him.

I'm sure worse will come out. The kid having coke in her system is just the beginning. I'm willing to bet the whole monty lawsuit is pure projection at this point.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

I was reading earlier about hair follicle tests - the steps always included washing the collected sample to remove contaminants. Wouldn't that remove the norcocaine on her hair from contact?

The metabolite is incorporated into the hair itself. You'd likely have to breakdown the hair during the wash step for it to be removed.

 

[Doctor Love]

They literally do oral swab drug tests.

Not reliably.

 

[Elite Kipchak]

Every time I think we've reached the absolute rock bottom of human depravity, some asshat comes out with a diamond tipped drill and proves that we can indeed go deeper. I've grown tired of this ride, Mr. Bones. I'd like to get off.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

the fact that these are the dots your brain can't stop connecting says something about you more than it does anyone else.

You must want to fuck spiders.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Nick is an idiot if he speaks about the document," "Nick is insecure." I've never seen this weirdo being the tiniest bit critical of Rekieta before. For him, this is positively scathing. Could this be the moment Nick's most ardent noseguarding janny balldowasher finally flees the sinking ship?

Looks like the Noseguards have finally lifted their noses....

 

[Dyn]

Nick is excused, he didn't cover his child in bodily fluids, he only covered her with cocaine.

We don't know that, we'd need to see the actual test results. I'm just saying it's possible.