Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.8%

  • Total voters
    337
I find it disturbing nobody took the kids in from Kayla or rekietas family. His sister had one grown ass kid, Kayla has God knows how many siblings and family in the area and rackets parents are healthy boomers by the look of it. NOT OF THEM COULD GET THE KIDS?! wtf?
Procedure.
It’s not always the best idea to just send kids to a family members house after being found in a drug den.

It takes steps to get there. I’m sure they are working behind the scenes to ensure that.
 
Last edited:
Given what we know about Nick he would be trying to keep his family and in-laws away from each other, but I don’t see how that can work given the five grandkids. Both families banding together to save the grandkids, and let Kayla and Nick flounder until they get clean, is the best case scenario.

This brings up a question I've had in the speculation about whether Kayla's parents are fostering the kids and maybe that they were not able to provide space or whatever else is required of your home to foster children: why haven't Nick's parents flown up and taken that role? They already have a house there, and they have the means to outfit it (or hell, buy and furnish one that has the space) for 5 kids? I can hardly believe grandparents would let those kids go into foster care when they have the means to take them on. My parents would spend their last dime rather than let my kids go live with strangers in a foster situation.
As of the Steel Vaginas podcast yesterday, April is wearing a watch Nick gave her in her profile picture. If that's to be believed, then that answer is yes, she will stay.
If that's true (and I listened to most of that stream, too, soj know he said it, just don't know if it's right), that is an astonishing thing to do and a huge fuck you to Kayla. I want to say I can't believe Nick would have been OK with that, but at this point...

A d to your earlier question, the house they have been living in belongs to a trust, but Nick and Kayla own the other one together. Suspicions are that April may be living there (OK that may be another Aaron speculation based on the fact that a check relating to some insurance company payout to April was sent to the Rekietas' PO box)
The Cops don't always play fair or nice. I would not rule out someone connected with the case, assuming the Nick Circus has really caught their attention among the piles of crap they deal with daily. Anyway Someone connected with the case may have noted Nick's scheduled glorious return to streaming, and dropped the document, or tipped somebody off that it was in the system, just to see what Baldo would do on stream.

If this is in fact what happened, it's kind of brilliant. It's a relatively trivial child privacy violation, which the Juvee and Family Court Judge may pitch a fit about. But it's not a Police or Prosecution Document. It's not something they have any responsibility or accountability for. The Privacy violation is The Kids, not Nick's. Nick has no privileges, protections or rights with regards to the document. So it has no impact on his criminal case. And Nick is not the kids advocate at this time. Note they did not leak this until after the court ruled to keep the kids.

And it got exactly the reaction on stream that they were likely hoping for. The Lawpope frothing shrieking and screaming. Saying things that will end up buying his lawyer a new Porsche.

You have to admire the strategic nastiness of it. And just how stupid Nick is.
CHIPS case information is publicly available at a public access terminal at a court. Anyone could have looked it up and, if the actual document was there, snapped photos of the screen.

 
All indications are that Nick's parents are still on side with Nick. Nick's dad was one of the 3 witnesses in the document that got posted and it's possible they are the foster parents (since he was not listed by name in the list of people present, and the only people not listed by name were the foster parents).

From what I gather, Ty Beard, who was Nick's grandfather's lawyer, was basically showing support.
But we don’t know what Nick dad would have been saying in testimony, but seems safe to assume it’s that Nick is a very good boy.

Got to wonder if Dad thinks April is a great addition to the family. I think Nick’s dad got his hopes up that Nick was finally achieving some real adult success with his livestream stuff and is having trouble accepting he ruined it all and is just a degenerate fuck up ruining his life while doing piles of cocaine. Dad might have a bad copium habit.

Not clear if the “foster parents” at the hearing were Kayla’s parents, but it seems likely. I think if they weren’t the foster parents they would have been named as witnesses like Nick’s dad.

I wish we knew if foster parents are advocating against the kids being returned, but that’s the vibe I get. I could see Nick convincing his Dad that the Kayla clan are enemies plotting his destruction along with Scandinavian prudes and a vast county government conspiracy. I’m positive Nick wouldn’t want Kayla communicating with her family, and if they are the foster parents that would make it a lot easier to keep them separated. Nick and Kayla can only be around the kids under court approved supervision. (But family members can be approved to be an individual supervising visits.)
 
I find it disturbing nobody took the kids in from Kayla or rekietas family. His sister had one grown ass kid, Kayla has God knows how many siblings and family in the area and rackets parents are healthy boomers by the look of it. NOT OF THEM COULD GET THE KIDS?! wtf?
Based on the report it seems like CPS don't want to allow it for now, which is kinda rare but far from unheard of.
 
Would it be possible for them to go free if they blame each other to the extent the jury couldn't decided who's responsible? Or would they both get guilty verdict?

That would be a cut throat defense. It rarely works out for people. In trying to implicate the other person, the person always tends to produce even more evidence against both themselves and the other person. If two people do it, you get twice the evidence produced. Its also difficult to get a jury to conclude that one person isn't better or more responsible than the other.

A plea deal is always the preferable option to doing that sort of thing in court.
 
Did I miss an episode? Why is everyone posting about “Qover” in his channel?
It's the official name of Nick's polycule. Inventing your own words for things that don't even need words seems a bit like cult behavior.

Something really weird has happened to to EVS.
You mean recently or just in general?

Probably very late, but even Metatron is talking about Balldo now lmao.
Karma is a bitch.
Metatron has always seemed like a secret dramawhore to me for some reason.
 
I could see Nick convincing his Dad that the Kayla clan are enemies plotting his destruction along with Scandinavian prudes and a vast county government conspiracy.
Elements of the conspiracy:
-Protecting children from neglect and abuse
-Enforcing state law
-Using government agencies in their intended functions

This is obviously a serious attack on Libertarian values.
 
Can we Superchat Cigarettes?
Is there a cryptocurrency tied to the prison value of a cigarette? Someone should get on that.
I’m sure Nick would move to Florida with April tomorrow if he wasn’t stuck in the muck.
"See, a new studio like I said. ... No, AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed, this channel has never been called Rekieta Law, it's always been Rekieta Vice."
why haven't Nick's parents flown up and taken that role?
But we don’t know what Nick dad would have been saying in testimony, but seems safe to assume it’s that Nick is a very good boy.
My understanding of the CHIPS record is that:
  • Everyone attended in person
  • The foster parents are listed
  • Robert Rekieta is Nick's father
  • Robert is not listed
  • Robert testified at the hearing
There is thread speculation (I have not seen anything but heresay) that Robert and his wife are licensed as as foster parents.

Hypothesis: Robert and his wife are the foster parents. Normally this would be hidden information; the foster parents are not listed by name. However, what court reporter would think to list Robert as also attending as a witness to hide that he is one of the foster parents?

Curious to hear what others think of this hypothesis. I think someone also suggested Robert & wife as the foster parents, but I didn't see the argument spelled out so explicitly.
 
Is there a cryptocurrency tied to the prison value of a cigarette? Someone should get on that.

"See, a new studio like I said. ... No, AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed, this channel has never been called Rekieta Law, it's always been Rekieta Vice."


My understanding of the CHIPS record is that:
  • Everyone attended in person
  • The foster parents are listed
  • Robert Rekieta is Nick's father
  • Robert is not listed
  • Robert testified at the hearing
There is thread speculation (I have not seen anything but heresay) that Robert and his wife are licensed as as foster parents.

Hypothesis: Robert and his wife are the foster parents. Normally this would be hidden information; the foster parents are not listed by name. However, what court reporter would think to list Robert as also attending as a witness to hide that he is one of the foster parents?

Curious to hear what others think of this hypothesis. I think someone also suggested Robert & wife as the foster parents, but I didn't see the argument spelled out so explicitly.
Are Nick's parents in state? For some reason I thought they were out of state and Kayla's were local.

Regardless CPS likely had 3 clear in family options for placement. Nick's Parents, Kayla's Parents and Kayla's sister. Heck, the church of Scandanavian Incel Prudes almost certainly has a support system to help them become quickly qualified.
 
Are Nick's parents in state? For some reason I thought they were out of state and Kayla's were local.

Regardless CPS likely had 3 clear in family options for placement. Nick's Parents, Kayla's Parents and Kayla's sister. Heck, the church of Scandanavian Incel Prudes almost certainly has a support system to help them become quickly qualified.
Kayla's parents are live in Minnesota and Nick's parents live in Florida, but I have NO DOUBT that trust fund daddy came running when he found out Nick had been arrested.
 
Are Nick's parents in state? For some reason I thought they were out of state and Kayla's were local.
I have seen a picture of Robert and wife in front of a house with snow on the lawn ITT. My understanding is that they "live" in Florida but also have a home in Minnesota. I have no information on their current whereabouts other than what I just stated.
 
Barnes is doubling down.
I was trying to be a very helpful person and write a summary but I failed :(
I started with a direct quote that I found significantly important:

“And we will go through that, cause it’s a crash course in that aspect as well. A crash course in how the state uses threats to take away your children to get you to forfeit your rights in a parallel civil and criminal cases. They do this ALL THE TIME. And that’s partially what has taken place here.”

(some more waffling on how CPS is kidnapping your children, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, 6th Amendment, 8th Amendment, social media mindset mentality, maddening of the crowd effect, stress of success, and how nobody ever lied to Barnes more often than CPS workers)

And that's when I stopped taking notes, 'cause BUDDY.
WHO CARES.
THERE WAS 26 GRAMS OF COKE IN THE HOUSE.
FUCK.
 
I usually point people to that thread if they ask.

If they post sensitive shit without an archive it becomes 'hey, faggot, I had to archive this for you so now read this'. So really it's better to ask.

To clarify my meaning: 'Try to find an archive tool online or in the Archival 101 thread before posting without archive and/or whinging "How do I archive this?" without putting any effort in.'

I’m sure Nick would move to Florida with April tomorrow if he wasn’t stuck in the muck.

Nick’s parents might want to keep an eye on him but Florida is about the worst state in the country for a coke head to move to unless the elder Rekeita’s are interested in seeing if Nick can snort away his entire trust fund in five years.

Nick’s main problem would be keeping Kayla on the leash. If she would file for divorce and custody his life gets x10 more complicated. His plan is probably to try and keep her under his thumb, get the kids back and then try to decamp to another state where divorce laws are more friendly to his needs. She would be completely isolated from any family or community support but would have to remain there to see her children.

Nick really just wants to shed his wife and kids so that he can do blow and MDMA with April, but he seems determined to make getting to that point as painful and difficult for everyone else in his life as is possible.

Im convinced his public pronouncements against divorce and pledges of monogamy are as much for Kayla and family as they are for his BS public persona grift. Nick definitely has some “masculine ideal” in his brain but he fails to live up to it in almost every way.

Nick has taken steps to isolate Kayla from her family. I remember in 2019-2020 that there were constant disruptions and noise from the neices and nephews visiting. There was also mention that Kayla's cousin was her 'bestie' and that she, Kayla, and Kayla's sister would spend time and share child-minding duties.

All that stopped in 2020 or 2021. I assumed it was Kayla wrangling the children better, but then we have 'worse day of my life' in 2021 or so... Many surmised there was a break with the in-laws, (see observations above, the shitty 'I will be us' tattoo, and the Sister repprt to the pastor) and it seems true now.It raises so many red flags for NPD and manipulative behaviour that Nick has shown.

TL;DR He probably does want it, but like a passive-aggressive faggot (see shower calls with Josh) he won't come out and say it. He wants to gaslight others into doing it.

I wish we knew if foster parents are advocating against the kids being returned, but that’s the vibe I get. I could see Nick convincing his Dad that the Kayla clan are enemies plotting his destruction along with Scandinavian prudes and a vast county government conspiracy. I’m positive Nick wouldn’t want Kayla communicating with her family, and if they are the foster parents that would make it a lot easier to keep them separated. Nick and Kayla can only be around the kids under court approved supervision. (But family members can be approved to be an individual supervising visits.)

See above re: the damaged relationship with the in-laws, but I think Nick really only tolerated his in-laws.

He moved to a state he hates for his wife.

He lives close to his wife's cousin

He goes to a Christian camp with his F-I-L and whinges about it

He whinges about the daytrips they take with her family (i.e. watermarks).

He only gets to see his parent's a few times a year.

I doubt he would openly express it, but he never truly got close to them. I am not sure his parents would openly split along pre-marital lines...

Elements of the conspiracy:
-Protecting children from neglect and abuse
-Enforcing state law
-Using government agencies in their intended functions

This is obviously a serious attack on Libertarian values.

See above.
 
@Null

Nick was texting you before the stream? Do you have any idea what exact time (his time if you could)?

I know he’s lying about Rumble studio. I just want to know if we can pin point it. He probably was having a tantrum.
 
Last edited:
Back