- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aging Wheels two year Polestar report. tl;dr he is an EV simp, so he loves the polestar he bought, but is still honest enough to point out all the issues he has with it. The depreciation is a nightmare. 62k to 18k in two years. Real world range of the car is between 150 and 200 miles. Officially claimed range is over 300.
All cars depreciate in value, there is no way he would be able to buck the trend of basic economics.I still remember Elon saying it would be financially insane not to buy a Tesla, because their OTA updates and the like would cause them to appreciate in value.
That's still way expensive which makes me think people still highly value these cars for whatever garbage reason.Currently, a basic 2020 Model 3 sells for about $26K, down from $46K. A 2020 basic Lexus IS 350 had an MSRP of $42K and sells for $31K right now.
All cars depreciate in value, there is no way he would be able to buck the trend of basic economics.
That's still way expensive which makes me think people still highly value these cars for whatever garbage reason.
Looking into getting a car with "hands free" self drive but sceptical about Tesla due to Elon removing radar sensors / USS and relying solely on cameras.
That shit sounds insane like the whole Boeing fiasco with only relying on one angle of attack sensor. Kinda afraid the car is going to phantom break and I will get rear ended.
He's a fun car simp, and EV's are fun. But they're not good, because battery and also them being overcomplicated computers that can be remotely controlled which is a nightmare. But they're fun and I'd drive one if they weren't so expensive and horrible in all the other aspects. That's the thing with EV's, they're not a miracle solution to the problem of replacing ICE cars, but they're fun toys. Very expensive and in some circumstances extremely dangerous, but they're fun.tl;dr he is an EV simp
There are some old cars that do appreciate in value. They don't even have to be that old or rare.All cars depreciate in value, there is no way he would be able to buck the trend of basic economics.
Sounds like you just have to get a used one if the guy in the video is accurate about the crazy depreciation rates on EV's. Hell, I may even get one in a decade or so when I can buy it for a couple grand and force it to navigate itself off a fucking cliff for the lulz.He's a fun car simp, and EV's are fun. But they're not good, because battery and also them being overcomplicated computers that can be remotely controlled which is a nightmare. But they're fun and I'd drive one if they weren't so expensive and horrible in all the other aspects. That's the thing with EV's, they're not a miracle solution to the problem of replacing ICE cars, but they're fun toys. Very expensive and in some circumstances extremely dangerous, but they're fun.
Remember, this is the guy that paid out of his ass to import one of the shittiest post-communist cars to be ever made, because he finds it fun.
It's not that he despises ICE's, it's that he likes cool cars, he got an EV because it's fun and experienced their shortcomings first hand. He also owns a conventional ICE Ford truck to haul shit around.
Man I'd love to own a 240/740 wagon one day. Love how blocky and utilitarian they were. The pre-lift 740 wagon was peak brick.There are some old cars that do appreciate in value. They don't even have to be that old or rare.
For example, old Volvo 240s and even 740s/940s have become a bit of a cult car so one in good condition can go for like 10,000 dollars in Sweden where as a couple of years ago it would go for just a few thousands. You would be hard pressed to find a road worthy one for under 3,000 when 2 decades ago you could get a shitheap for like 300.
IMO it's well worth the money as well. They are easy to work on, they run forever if you keep the rust at bay and the rear wheel drive is fun too. Can you even call yourself a Swede if you don't want to go drifting in an old Volvo every time there is fresh snow?
Yeah, I love them. I was specifically looking for one of those 2 cars last time I wanted to buy a car. I ended up finding a really nice 245 with basically no rust and only 29,000 Nordic miles on it so about 180,000 ish imperial miles.Man I'd love to own a 240/740 wagon one day. Love how blocky and utilitarian they were. The pre-lift 740 wagon was peak brick.
View attachment 5927050
> Save money by making the gas pedal a glorified Logitech controller.Tesla is recalling all of their Cybertrucks, because the accelerator pedal can get stuck. It's becoming a total clown show to see all the ways the Cybertruck is shitting the bed as a car right now.
Cars are the worst investment you can make but have to if you want to have any sort of autonomy. I still have my 10+ year old small car from university which will probably outlive every current Tesla brand.There are some old cars that do appreciate in value. They don't even have to be that old or rare.
For example, old Volvo 240s and even 740s/940s have become a bit of a cult car so one in good condition can go for like 10,000 dollars in Sweden where as a couple of years ago it would go for just a few thousands. You would be hard pressed to find a road worthy one for under 3,000 when 2 decades ago you could get a shitheap for like 300.
I call him an EV simp because he's extremely invested in EVs, far beyond the "they're fun" stage, to the point of sinking a small fortune into two separate EV conversion projects, one of which (the hauler bus) is now essentially abandoned. I'm not saying this as a detractor as such because I agree that EVs are fun to drive, and once I have the cash I'll be investigating an EV or hybrid conversion of my old jeep. I say it because he's fully bought into the idea that EVs are both a net social and environmental good, and an inevitable future, when the former is questionable at best and the latter relies on a whole bunch of assumptions that are currently not proving true. He also repeats the claim that EVs require less servicing, which is one of those lies of omission that I really can't abide. They require "less servicing" because when a failure happens, you rip and replace whole sealed sub-assemblies instead of having the option to repair the components.He's a fun car simp, and EV's are fun. But they're not good, because battery and also them being overcomplicated computers that can be remotely controlled which is a nightmare.
TBH, they are likely to skyrocket in price if the EU actually goes through with their planned ban on new ICE cars. In 2050 you might pay 10 times more for a nice street legal ICE car than what you payed for it pre ban. Think of the US 86 "machinegun" ban as an example, it made pre ban transferable "machineguns" worth as much as a cheep house.ICE cars might buck the trend though if you can buy one cheap and have the ability to repair it yourself (selling it when the supply kicks back up), though it depends how draconic your country is regarding fixing your own car.
Batteries wear down pretty quickly. There really is very little difference between the battery in a Tesla and the battery in your phone. You can make it last longer by never charging over 80% and discharging below 20%, but then you’re only getting half the advertised range, which is already fairly low compared to a combustion engine.Sounds like you just have to get a used one if the guy in the video is accurate about the crazy depreciation rates on EV's. Hell, I may even get one in a decade or so when I can buy it for a couple grand and force it to navigate itself off a fucking cliff for the lulz.
In theory, EV's do require less servicing. Like James May said in that clip someone posted above, an electric motor is a very elegant way of creating torque. The issue is that every modern EV is unnecessarily complicated and prone to serious issues requiring major rebuilds by design when they shouldn't be. I agree that it's a massive lie by omission, but the omission in this case is EV's in theory vs EV's in practice.He also repeats the claim that EVs require less servicing, which is one of those lies of omission that I really can't abide. They require "less servicing" because when a failure happens, you rip and replace whole sealed sub-assemblies instead of having the option to repair the components.
Yeah that is insanely gay. They are not an environmental good. You know the slogan Reduce, Reuse, Recycle? This is the cornerstone of ecology. You don't save the environment by making more, but by reusing what has been already made. Millions of ICE cars have been made and can be used, EV's have to be made, and the environmental impact of this process, and processes like obtaining lithium are never mentioned.he's fully bought into the idea that EVs are both a net social and environmental good, and an inevitable future
reminds me of when people were buying pre-builts from places like microcenter because the GPU in them were worth so much that it was like getting the rest of the computer for free.the one good thing to come of it will be a huge surplus of cheap, high capacity lithium cells. Off-grid and whole-home-UPS types will be salivating at the thought.
electric cars easily compete and win over conventional cars. as long as those cars are from the 1950s,Real world range of the car is between 150 and 200 miles.
exactly outside of first hand knowledge and an honest sharing of his experiences i wouldn't trust his evaluation of what is "fun" or a "good idea" he's the auto equivalent of someone into bestiality.this is the guy that paid out of his ass to import one of the shittiest post-communist cars to be ever made, because he finds it fun.
people don't realize EVs were the "normal" cars while ICE was the newer weird one. and the reason ICE won was because A. being cheaper, B. being easier for any asshhole to repair/modify and C. the economics of europe changed a fuck load in the 1910s compared to the 1890s so the price of electricity vs gas really tilted the scales in ICE favor. As people have probably noticed, energy costs have skyrocketed compared to 5 years ago, so the cost per mile to drive an EV is a fuck load more than it is to drive a gas car now, whereas that was considered a huge plus for EVs.It sounds like the EV hype generated by the media and online slacktivists is just that, while the automotive industry doesnt want to dedicate plants to making EVs when they can make ICE vehicles instead. Go figure.