- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
Is the idea of no more new vidya really so bad for people?
Apparently it is based on the people in here who are willing to buy this garbage as long as it's a carbon copy of Saints Row 3's gameplay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the idea of no more new vidya really so bad for people?
After what we've seen, i'd gladly take back this
There are people watching the trailer for SR3 released back in 2011, and actually joking that this is the new trailer for the upcoming Saints Row game in the comments section.
This. I don't see why so many people are so worried about there never being any good games in the future. First off, of course there will be, just keep checking the indie scene and ignore the pretentious shit there, you can find lots of gems. Triple A games in general have been bad for years but occasionally put out something decent, some people don't need to worry/doompost about it being completely doomed. Second; as you said, go back and play old games. I have two dozen games in my Steam library that I still need to play, all of them being older releases. Then there's a shit ton of games I need to play on things like emulators and what not, and many games still get updates with more content to play. Then there's of course replaying old classic games you love, maybe getting all achievements in some, doing challenge runs of certain games, and so on. We could stop getting new games for 5-10 years and I'll still have shit I can go back to and play. I ignore the tards who have some weird stigma against older games because they're "old", older games in a series tend to be much better than newer entries anyways. People who feel the need to consooom all the brand new vidya need to go back and enjoy the classics, and stop dishing out 60-80 bucks on polished turds.Then you go back to your old games that held up.
Is the idea of no more new vidya really so bad for people?
I mean, you constantly see dumb fucks in the comments of old games on Youtube acting like every copy of them vanished, referring to them in the past tense and all acting like they can't be played any more.
Is the idea of no more new vidya really so bad for people?
Will it still let me create a character whole cloth and give me some more creation options?
Will it let me edit my own radio station so I can listen to my early metal/punk/postpunk mixes while wrecking shit?
Will the guns have more weight and "ooomph" to them?
Will it give me some options to edit my gang's look?
Are the controls at least passable and not too floaty?
SR3's gunplay was better than 2, and the controls were good enough, so that won't be a point against it.yes
not known
it's SR3 guns type
no
see 1 step above
Anon on /v/ is right. It's almost as if this game takes place in an alternate timeline where Dane Vogel won.
All of the guns, especially SMGs, were terrible in 3 because they relied on the upgrade system and bullet sponges.SR3's gunplay was better than 2
Can't offend the fat retarded dangerhairs by having attractive women in your game, but feel free to have all the hot dudes you want. Like in Mass Effect Andromeda:Also: has anyone else noticed how just about every female character in games now has to have problem glasses and a giant fucking nose? What's the deal with that? Self-insert or what?
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned the idea of a Saints Row reboot being a mid 2000s period piece, why not go with that?
I'd love to see game with the aesthetic from back when "gangsta" stuff was still cool.
ok, I will tell you why this whole SR situation is so bad:Apparently it is based on the people in here who are willing to buy this garbage as long as it's a carbon copy of Saints Row 3's gameplay.